Centre for Engineering Education (CREE) | University of Cape Town | South Africa
You are here >>| index | projects.html

Current Research

Duncan Fraser:  Student learning though computer simulation

This project is supported by the NRF as well as by a joint NRF-SIDA (Swedish Research Agency) grant.  In 2003 we explored the phenomenographic understanding of student learning, as it applies to learning by computer simulations.  We also ran a fourth-year student research project in which a pair of students examined the learning of third year students through a distillation column computer simulation.  The students re-designed an existing computer simulation to encourage better learning, and then analysed how the students engaged with it. 

Student success in engineering

This project is supported by an NRF research grant.  In 2003 we continued to gather data on student success, as well as analysing patterns of success of different groups of students at UCT.  Work was also done on comparing the measures of success proposed in the National Plan with those determined by detailed analysis of cohorts of entering students.  When this work was presented at the 15th International Conference on Quality in Higher Education, it attracted considerable attention, particularly from the Higher Education Quality Committee.  The next phase of this study will be factors affecting student success.

Jenni Case and Duncan Fraser: Recent graduates perceptions of the curriculum

Jenni and Duncan ran a fourth-year research project in which a pair of students interviewed sixteen recent graduates as to their perceptions of the UCT Chemical Engineering curriculum.  This project deliberately took an in-depth interview approach, rather than the questionnaire approach which is usually used in such studies, which led to collection of rich data and some unexpected results, such as the link between technical confidence and good communication. 

Jenni Case: Students’ Experiences of Learning

Our initial work in this area identified approaches to learning used by chemical engineering students, and related these to perceptions of the course and student success.  A further focus was on the extent to which teaching interventions enabled students to engage in metacognitive development and change their approach to learning.  The course context was found to be a confounding factor in enabling this change, in particular highly time pressured environments.   

We have subsequently engaged in some critique of the approaches to learning framework, and have sought to develop new theoretical approaches that take better account of the broader socio-cultural context.  We are attempting to incorporate aspects of discourse analysis and also situated cognition, to develop a better way of understanding students’ experiences of learning. 

Our current research project involved participation in a third year chemical engineering course, and a series of individual interviews with most of the students in the class.   Furthermore, all students completed an approach to learning questionnaire.  Analysis of the latter allowed for a significant critique of inventory based approach to learning research.  Preliminary analyses of one of the interviews produced a comprehensive picture of a ‘discourse’ occupied by chemical engineering students, and a discussion of the impact of this discourse on learning.  Current analyses are around the themes of ‘alienation’ and ‘engagement’ and the extent to which the course environment impacts on these. 

Jeff Jawitz: Staff development

His PhD study focuses on the development of new academic staff as educators at a South African university using assessment practice as a window on the process of ‘coming to know’ within a departmental context. His key question is: How do new academic staff in higher education become socialised into the departmental practices of assessing student performance?

Howard Pearce: Curriculum design using a systems approach

Curriculum ‘design’ appears to be undertaken without using the very principles and strategies that we require our students to use in their product designs.  Can this be justified because of the different nature of the end product?  The curriculum is not simply a linear, logical stepping through of material.  It is a whole experience.  It should therefore be designed with a holistic approach in mind, such as a systems approach.  This first attempt is employing the principles of systems thinking to evaluate the present curriculum.

Transformative Learning

Our experience in facilitating learning in a first year physics course has resulted in an approach that initially attempts to assist students to change the way they think about physical artefacts and systems – by emphasizing that we utilize models to explain and predict behaviour.  However, students who continue to struggle conceptually also appear to manifest a certain lack of awareness of the world around them – the physical, academic, intellectual, emotional world.  Adult education literature contains the notion of transformative learning.  It is my goal, through action research, to establish an environment and framework in which students are enabled to make the necessary transformations on the way to becoming independent learners.

Brandon Reed: Learners’ interaction with technology
His research interests include low cost automation and robotics as well as social aspects of technology and engineering education. He is currently completing his PhD that investigates how school children experience engaging with technology. This is qualitative study, from a phenomenographic perspective, that draws on his natural science and social science strengths.

 


 

Return to top of page                                                                                                             Return to CREE home page

Centre for Engineering Education (CREE)